With the WG Chairs permission.
RFC 2181 is growing a both long in the tooth. It is, by its own admission, a
collection of eight distinct and independent ideas. As such, it is difficult
to work on one of
those ideas without raising concerns about all of them. With some coworkers,
we split out each of the ideas in RFC 2181 and have created a standalone ID
that has the
EXACT text from RFC 2181. What would be a very nice, administrative, step is
to take each of these IDs and last call them, turning them into RFCs with the
same status
as RFC 2181. It will then be possible to declare RFC 2181 historic, and folks
that then want to update/work on specifics can make changes against these new
RFCs.
The drafts in question are:
draft-pfrc-2181--naming-issues-00
DNS Naming Issues
draft-pfrc-2181-handling-zone-cuts-00
Handling DNS Zone Cuts
draft-pfrc-2181-name-syntax-00
DNS Name Syntax
draft-pfrc-2181-resource-record-sets-00
DNS Resource Record Sets
draft-pfrc-2181-soa-records-00
Issues Concerning DNS SOA Resource Records
draft-pfrc-2181-tc-bit-00
Use of the TC (Truncated) Header Bit for DNS Responses
draft-pfrc-2181-ttl-00
DNS Resource Record TTL
draft-pfrc-rfc2181-historic-issues-00
RFC2181 to Historic draft-pfrc-rfc2181-historic-issues-00 Abstract
I would like the WG to adopt these drafts.
manning
bmann...@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
