With the WG Chairs permission.

RFC 2181 is growing a both long in the tooth.  It is, by its own admission, a 
collection of eight distinct and independent ideas.  As such, it is difficult 
to work on one of 
those ideas without raising concerns about all of them.   With some coworkers, 
we split out each of the ideas in RFC 2181 and have created a standalone ID 
that has the 
EXACT text from RFC 2181.  What would be a very nice, administrative, step is 
to take each of these IDs and last call them, turning them into RFCs with the 
same status
as RFC 2181.  It will then be possible to declare RFC 2181 historic, and folks 
that then want to update/work on specifics can make changes against these new 
RFCs.

The drafts in question are:

draft-pfrc-2181--naming-issues-00 
DNS Naming Issues
        
draft-pfrc-2181-handling-zone-cuts-00 
Handling DNS Zone Cuts
        
draft-pfrc-2181-name-syntax-00 
DNS Name Syntax
        
draft-pfrc-2181-resource-record-sets-00 
DNS Resource Record Sets

draft-pfrc-2181-soa-records-00 
Issues Concerning DNS SOA Resource Records
        
draft-pfrc-2181-tc-bit-00 
Use of the TC (Truncated) Header Bit for DNS Responses
        
draft-pfrc-2181-ttl-00 
DNS Resource Record TTL
        
draft-pfrc-rfc2181-historic-issues-00 
RFC2181 to Historic draft-pfrc-rfc2181-historic-issues-00 Abstract

I would like the WG to adopt these drafts.

manning
bmann...@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to