<secretary-hat on> On Jul 8, 2015, at 8:06 AM, Hugo Maxwell Connery <h...@env.dtu.dk> wrote: > I posit that continued inaction on the question of "Does the .onion case > fit the RFC6761 mechanism" actually weakens the reputation of the IETF, and > certainly that of DNSOP. > > I acknowledge that it is important to have discussion and a wide range > of opinion expressed, such that an informed decision can be made. > We have seen plenty of discussion. > > I beleve that it is time to make a decision. People will then respond to > that in whatever manner best suits their objectives. > > I encourage the relevant chairs of the working groups to push for a decision.
Just to be clear: the WG already did decide that. The WG document has been submitted to the IESG a few weeks ago. See the archives of this list, and <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld/history/>. To see the (hopefully-up-to-date) list of WG documents, see <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html> --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
