On 06/07/2015 16:42, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Because there are lots of other systems that watch either end. A
> logger that expects a query is the one I am most concerned about, but
> there are probably others as well. I understand that you feel "they
> are broken and we shouldn't care about them". I care about avoiding
> broken things if we can get the same functionality.

I've personally written a logger that expects QDCOUNT == 1

However it just drops the packet if that's not true, it doesn't "break".

Ray

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to