On 06/07/2015 16:42, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Because there are lots of other systems that watch either end. A > logger that expects a query is the one I am most concerned about, but > there are probably others as well. I understand that you feel "they > are broken and we shouldn't care about them". I care about avoiding > broken things if we can get the same functionality. I've personally written a logger that expects QDCOUNT == 1 However it just drops the packet if that's not true, it doesn't "break". Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
