Stephane and Paul, I’m ok with anything that provides effective negative feedback. Dropping queries or redirecting them is ok with me.
Thanks, Steve On Jul 5, 2015, at 5:11 AM, P Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > Delay is expensive for responders since it requires state. Steve's goal of > making some tld strings flaky so as to encourage developers to avoid DNS for > those names could be met statelessly. For example delegate them to localhost. > > On July 5, 2015 12:51:08 PM GMT+01:00, Stephane Bortzmeyer > <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 09:16:17AM -0700, > Steve Crocker <st...@shinkuro.com> wrote > a message of 21 lines which said: > > except for the additional load it places on the root servers, > > RFC 7535 could be a solution. > > I propose augmenting the DNS to include entries in the root that > serve the purpose of giving slow NXDOMAIN responses instead of quick > responses for those strings that the IETF has identified as not > TLDs. > > If it is a serious proposal, I object. Delaying answers require > keeping state in the authoritative name server and opens a nice DoS > boulevard. > > > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
