manning wrote:
>       There in lies the problem.  These systems have no way to disambiguate a 
> local v. global scope.
>          It seems like the obvious solution is to ensure that these nodes do 
> NOT have global scope, i.e. No connection to the Internets
>          and no way to attempt DNS resolution.   Or they need to ensure that 
> DNS resolution occurs after every other “name lookup technology”
>          which is not global in scope.

I don't understand this point.  Since Onion hidden service names are
based on hashes derived from public keys surely they're globally scoped
(barring hash collisions)?

-- 
Robert Edmonds

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to