manning wrote: > There in lies the problem. These systems have no way to disambiguate a > local v. global scope. > It seems like the obvious solution is to ensure that these nodes do > NOT have global scope, i.e. No connection to the Internets > and no way to attempt DNS resolution. Or they need to ensure that > DNS resolution occurs after every other “name lookup technology” > which is not global in scope.
I don't understand this point. Since Onion hidden service names are based on hashes derived from public keys surely they're globally scoped (barring hash collisions)? -- Robert Edmonds _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
