Looks ok to me, thanks.
-- Bob Harold hostmaster, UMnet, ITcom Information and Technology Services (ITS) rharo...@umich.edu 734-647-6524 desk On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:10:33AM -0400, > Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote > a message of 132 lines which said: > > > Every time the TTL of those records expires, that part of the cache > > is "cold", so it will happen regularly, > > We talk here about infrastructure (NS and SOA records), which > typically have longer TTLs. Anyway, to address your remark, I suggest > to move this trick to appendix B, like all the other alternatives, and > to add a remark in section 7 (security considerations) remarking that > all the alternatives in appendix B decrease privacy. Does it work? > This is committed as > < > https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work/commit/604aff49dc9e80a87b9fe0093bc602095914510b > > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
