Bob Harold wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:38 AM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org > <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> wrote: > > ... > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-04 > > At the end of section 6 it says: > > A possible solution is > to always use the traditional algorithm when the cache is cold and > then to move to QNAME minimisation. This will decrease the privacy a > bit > > Every time the TTL of those records expires, that part of the cache is > "cold", so it will happen regularly, and over time any repeated query > will show up in the logs, so I think it affects privacy much more than > "a bit" and should be avoided completely if privacy is a concern. > Does that make sense?
i agree with bob harold's analysis of the likely outcome of the 'when cold' approach described in the above quote. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
