On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:48:41PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote: > > This is a really good point. I think there does need to be a .ALT registry > in order for .ALT to be able to address anything other than experimental uses. And I think this would actually be a good thing.
If we created a registry for alt, how would alt not be just another TLD with exactly the same status as any other domain name registry? You can already register a name in the DNS registries and not turn it on in the DNS. What you're suggesting is that the IETF run a parallel registry for people who don't want to pay registrars and registries. I think it would be unwise for the IETF to get into that business. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
