On 5/18/15, 7:12 AM, "John R Levine" <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
>> These comments might be more usefully said in the relevant ICANN forums. > >If you could suggest which ones those are, I can certainly send a note. >Like Paul, I just don't have time to follow all of the ever larger set of >ICANN processes. I don’t think there is currently an open forum for this topic at ICANN, since it is not actively under consideration. If this were to change in the future, I’ll be happy to send the pointer to this list (provided I’m still at ICANN). In the meantime, during the upcoming ICANN meeting (as it is the case every ICANN meeting) there is a public forum where any member of the community can raise any topic to the ICANN Board while facing the community. You don’t have to travel to participate, there is remote participation. Alternatively, correspondence can be sent to ICANN leadership for consideration and it will get posted publicly in the related section of the website. Finally, there is the option of working within the gNSO to develop a policy on this regard. Just my two cents. -- Francisco. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
