>need therefore not to delegate it." But in the former case, one needs >a pretty good argument why we need anything stronger than ICANN's >policy statement that the names are blocked indefinitely -- certainly, >one needs a better argument than "I don't trust ICANN," because it's >already got the policy token.
I would be much happier with a statement that said "the names are blocked indefinitely, and here's the plan for the $4 million in application fees we accepted for those names." R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
