-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/13/2015 03:05 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> we should not be poaching on turf already handed to someone else.
> Managing top-level domains that are intended to be looked up in the
> DNS -- even if people expect them to be part of a "local root" or
> otherwise not actually part of the DNS -- is, I increasingly think,
> part of ICANN's remit.
>
> Managing things that are domain names that are by definition 
> _never_ to be looked up in the DNS is different, and we have a
> legitimate claim (I'm arguing.  I should note I'm not sure I
> completely buy the distinction I'm making, but I want to keep
> testing it).
>
*** I better understand now your reluctance on P2PNames: .bit has
exactly one feet on each side of your argument.

I was waiting for the minutes of the Interim Meeting (especially the
parts concerning the adoption of OnionTLD by this WG, and the part
concerning the P2PNames draft) but I must say that the P2PNames party is
already contemplating working on split drafts to facilitate the
proceeding in a reasonable time of non-controversial strings, including
to support draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld (albeit with some reserves),
and clarify the discussion so that such arguments become apparent.

Andrew you will have an opportunity to test your assumption more
practically soon. :)

I'm looking for financial support to pursue this task: I am not employed
by a generous corporation and most of my colleagues do not have mandates
for that either.  As usual the fringe of innovation on the end-to-end
Internet matches the hi-tech-lo-life style of Cyberpunk novels.

Regards,

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=YtU0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to