On May 11, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > > This makes me think that what we ought to offer ICANN is a mechanism > to make insertions into the special-names registry by different > criteria than the protocol-shift cases. The latter all fit neatly > into 6761's "7 questions", but policy-based ones sort of don't.
I see your point here, but is that really the right thing to do? It seems to me that the distinction you have drawn is a good distinction, but argues for a separate registry for "please don't send these to the root" than for "these have special non-DNS protocol uses" with points to the documents describing those uses. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
