> On May 12, 2015, at 7:44 AM, hellekin <helle...@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> *** So in my understanding of the scope boundaries of RFC6761 IANA
> considerations, which seems to be the main difference between our drafts
> and our respective positions, the former is "an application", while the
> latter bundles "an application" and "a name resolution API or library".

Being a SOCKS-based service, of course, any SOCKS-enabled client can talk to 
Onion-space; including SSH, for instance.

    -a

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to