> On May 12, 2015, at 7:44 AM, hellekin <helle...@gnu.org> wrote: > > *** So in my understanding of the scope boundaries of RFC6761 IANA > considerations, which seems to be the main difference between our drafts > and our respective positions, the former is "an application", while the > latter bundles "an application" and "a name resolution API or library".
Being a SOCKS-based service, of course, any SOCKS-enabled client can talk to Onion-space; including SSH, for instance. -a
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop