On Apr 2, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Dave Lawrence <t...@dd.org> wrote: > Personally I'm not fond of the master/slave language and avoid the > terms. I recognize their historic computer use and don't feel the > need to be preachy about it, but in my own speech I use > primary/secondary.
Same here. I would go a bit further and suggest that primary and secondary should be preferred. I've suggested that to document authors in the past and haven't gotten any pushback, at least in the context of DNS primaries and secondaries. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
