> Tim Wicinski <mailto:tjw.i...@gmail.com> > Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:37 PM > > Speaking for myself, I love Evan's idea with picking one rrset.
i didn't want to be the first to say so, since a lot of the ideas i like are ugly ducklings. but since others have chimed in positively, i'll add my voice: this is a beautiful swan. > It is simple. Would the simplest be to grab the first rrset it finds? that would be an overspecification. the spec should simply say "any RRset, where the choice of which RRset is implementation-dependent". some might go for oldest; some for smallest; some for first. we should not say, other than perhaps to say "if an implementation always chooses its RRset according to static preferences, then AAAA should have a higher priority than A." -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
