i am restricting my CC to "dnsop@", for reasons previously given.
Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >> ... >> > >> > If one really wants to reduce the number of packets required with >> > SMTP processibg just write a RFC that says A and AAAA records should >> > be returned in the additional section if no MX records exist at the >> > qname. This is currently permitted so vendors could do this today. > > For some data; Route 53 does do this for MX, NS, SRV and CNAME. It's > never been a problem, and does seem to speed up processing a little. i think this shows the need for an RFC on this topic. (and returning AAAA as additional for A queries, and A as additional for AAAA queries.) -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
