On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message <3d558422-d5da-4434-bded-e752ba353...@flame.org>, Michael Graff > writes: >> What problem are we specifically trying to solve here again? > > A non-problem for most of us. > >> Michael > > If one really wants to reduce the number of packets required with > SMTP processibg just write a RFC that says A and AAAA records should > be returned in the additional section if no MX records exist at the > qname. This is currently permitted so vendors could do this today.
For some data; Route 53 does do this for MX, NS, SRV and CNAME. It's never been a problem, and does seem to speed up processing a little. -- Colm _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
