On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Ed Pascoe wrote:

I don't think this needs to fall under DNSOP at all. Its probably more 
appropriate for the eppext group. 

And in fact we tried it in dnsop a few years ago, leading to a use-cases
document failure stuck between the Registrant-Registrar-Registry model
people, and the rest of the world. It dies and people just focused on
the DNS record updating part.

So yes, +1 to taking this to eppext.

Paul

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to