On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Ed Pascoe wrote:
I don't think this needs to fall under DNSOP at all. Its probably more appropriate for the eppext group.
And in fact we tried it in dnsop a few years ago, leading to a use-cases document failure stuck between the Registrant-Registrar-Registry model people, and the rest of the world. It dies and people just focused on the DNS record updating part. So yes, +1 to taking this to eppext. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
