with search pages. Something like default vs. non-default or opt-in vs. opt-out
would describe it better.
I don't think "default policy-implementing resolver" makes any sense.
While "opt-in policy-implementing resolver" does make sense, "opt-out
policy-implementing resolver" does not. I'm not as concerned about the
rathole as you are, but I certainly don't want to use terms that make no
sense.
I meant default as in it's the one configured by default for a provider's
users, e.g., by DHCP.
The ISPs I know of that have policy resolvers to rewrite NXDOMAIN
configure them by default, but provide some way for users to opt out so
they get the real result instead. I don't particularly care what the
wording is so long as it describes what actually happens rather than how
we think the users ought to feel.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
