In message <19b42657-aed1-440e-8300-996915a28...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad 
writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote:
> > AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale;
>
> I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't
> already known ages ago (i.e., BGP works).
>
> I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would be 6to4 and I'd
> refer to the discussion around
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-08.
>
> However, I'm a bit confused: AFAIK, we're talking about a draft that has
> been revised and that revision has not been submitted to DNSOP for
> consideration (yet).  Perhaps it would make sense to defer discussion
> until the revised draft is more generally available?
>
> Regards,
> -drc

6to4 has asymetric routing 99.99999% of the time, encapsulating
IPv4 address mismatch, etc. which are 6to4 specific issues.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to