Hi, On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > AS112 absolutely proves that unowned anycast can work at scale;
I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't already known ages ago (i.e., BGP works). I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would be 6to4 and I'd refer to the discussion around https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-08. However, I'm a bit confused: AFAIK, we're talking about a draft that has been revised and that revision has not been submitted to DNSOP for consideration (yet). Perhaps it would make sense to defer discussion until the revised draft is more generally available? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
