On Nov 10, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Paul Ebersman <list-dn...@dragon.net> wrote: > IPv6 is still in early adoption for broad general use and we don't know > what plans folks have for requiring PTRs.
I apologize for picking and choosing from your response, but I think this sums it up perfectly: if we do not yet know what plans they have, then we need not care. There is currently no support in any infrastructure of which I am aware for populating the reverse tree in IPv6 for customer IP addresses. Lots of customers are using IPv6, and are not having issues. It is indeed early days, but Comcast's deployment, and other deployments of which I am aware, are seeing real use by real users. So if e.g. Comcast were coming to us right now and saying "we're getting a lot of phone calls because of foo," then we could talk about foo. But that's not happening, as far as I can tell. IOW, you are borrowing trouble. Please don't borrow trouble. At present we do not need to clean up the IPv6 reverse tree. If we say anything about the reverse tree, it should be with the goal in mind of preserving that pleasant status quo. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
