> Paul Hoffman <mailto:paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> > Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:06 AM > > 1) It is a patent application, not a patent. > 2) The application was filed by Verisign, not Google. > > --Paul Hoffman
thanks. however, i was told google also has one on Q-M. that's the one i thought this thread referred to. if verisign tries to enforce their patent against google, i will buy popcorn, sit back, and watch. i do not believe that verisign's interests are aligned with enforcement of a patent like this one. verisign should be asked to place a defense-only status on this patent. i think they will do so. -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
