On 25/10/14 15:56, Ted Lemon wrote: > And also if anyone from Verisign is participating, they are required to > disclose,
Well, only if they think that the IPR is relevant. Their claims (I've not read 'em) could after all be unrelated to the draft, e.g. if they've only claimed some madly complicated way of getting the same effect as just leaving stuff out (which no doubt the USPTO might still, in their infinite wisdom, consider patentable;-). S. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
