On 9/07/2014 5:17 am, "David Conrad" <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:
>On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >> Perhaps a way forward here is to reign in the current effort and >>constrain it to the best way of using a local copy of the root zone on a >>resolver today, with no protocol or specification changes to resolvers. >>Once we've identified the best such configuration and have identified >>any operational concerns with it, we will be in a much better position >>to consider changes to the resolver spec and/or new root zone >>distribution mechanisms to make it better. > >+1 > >Perhaps two drafts, one as Joe describes above. The second, perhaps >being Experimental, discussing thoughts on resolver modifications or >novel zone distribution mechanisms? That works for me, I think there is a natural inheritance there that will certainly help scope the problem statement and the requirements of the second document, so please do "A" and then work on "B" as Joe suggests. Cheers, Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
