On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:17 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: >> Perhaps a way forward here is to reign in the current effort and constrain >> it to the best way of using a local copy of the root zone on a resolver >> today, with no protocol or specification changes to resolvers. Once we've >> identified the best such configuration and have identified any operational >> concerns with it, we will be in a much better position to consider changes >> to the resolver spec and/or new root zone distribution mechanisms to make it >> better. > > +1 > > Perhaps two drafts, one as Joe describes above. The second, perhaps being > Experimental, discussing thoughts on resolver modifications or novel zone > distribution mechanisms? The AS112-like paradigm proposed in draft-lee-dnsop-scalingroot-00.txt also deserves review and comment. (I've got no opinion on this, yet, as co-chair or root server operator or anything else, beyond "it should be discussed openly, with an eye on technical/operational means of making DNS resolution for internet users work/scale better.") thx, Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
