On 8 jul 2014, at 20:30, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:39 PM, Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: >> One could say the discussion is a typical non-constructive IETF discussion >> which too many are. > > Seems like it has been (mostly) a constructive discussion to me.
Now yes, I completely agree! >>>> Once again, this is such a large issue that I would prefer a bit better >>>> arguments than what is demonstrated here. >>> >>> Actually, since it is opt-in, it doesn't seem to be that large of an issue >>> to me, but perhaps that's because I'm not a root server operator and have >>> no particular interest in maintaining the status quo. >> >> I do not see it as opt-in. Definitely not. I see this draft be a tool that >> is used to force opt in to a different root zone than what ICANN is >> managing. A very effective tool regarding fragmenting the Internet. >> >> And having an incoming CTO of ICANN requesting fragmentation of the Internet >> actually worries me a bit. >> >> Because of this, I think it must proven that increased deployment of this >> technology will not increase fragmentation of the Internet. > > I'll admit I'm quite surprised and disappointed in your response here. I > hope you'll forgive me if I choose not to respond to you further on this > thread. That is completely understood, and excuses are not needed, if you forgive me ;-) I was, as you saw, surprised myself over your words in the mail I responded to. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
