Patrik, On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:39 PM, Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: > One could say the discussion is a typical non-constructive IETF discussion > which too many are.
Seems like it has been (mostly) a constructive discussion to me. >>> Once again, this is such a large issue that I would prefer a bit better >>> arguments than what is demonstrated here. >> >> Actually, since it is opt-in, it doesn't seem to be that large of an issue >> to me, but perhaps that's because I'm not a root server operator and have no >> particular interest in maintaining the status quo. > > I do not see it as opt-in. Definitely not. I see this draft be a tool that is > used to force opt in to a different root zone than what ICANN is managing. A > very effective tool regarding fragmenting the Internet. > > And having an incoming CTO of ICANN requesting fragmentation of the Internet > actually worries me a bit. > > Because of this, I think it must proven that increased deployment of this > technology will not increase fragmentation of the Internet. I'll admit I'm quite surprised and disappointed in your response here. I hope you'll forgive me if I choose not to respond to you further on this thread. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
