On 28 May 2014, at 15:23, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > So not to put too fine a point on it, but where is the use case for this > proposal? It seems like something that is more of someone's cool hack than > a standard people ought to implement. What am I missing?
Is the use case perhaps the ability to attack comment-like metadata to dynamic updates and IXFRs, to help document data elements in particularly widely-distributed and heterogenous environments? (I think the proposal is well-written and intelligent, but I also struggle slightly to imagine a use case beyond "work around the fact that the nameserver I'm using likes to throw away my nice comments" :-) If this is really something that's mainly useful for BIND9, then you'd think a private RRType would suffice, similar to the use of TYPE65534 in BIND9's auto-dnssec maintain). Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
