On 21.05.2014 08:09, Mark Andrews wrote:
What's wrong with:
_http._tcp.example.net. SRV ... www.example.net.
Nothing.
Hi,
please take into account that a CNAME + DNAME, the previously discussed BNAME or
the now discussed ENAME solution is still interesting for domain name registries
that have to deal with (maybe lots of) IDN variants. I don't think that SRV
records are a viable solution for their use case.
Regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
