This sounds to me like a) support for working on edns-client-subnet (and possibly things like it in the future), with b) a resulting RFC as "Informational".
I've found this discussion very helpful in solidifying the thoughts Tim already wrote about, particularly with regards to carrying out our new charter. Thank you all. best, Suzanne On May 7, 2014, at 1:06 PM, P Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > I think if we want good engineering then we should recommend on host or on > net validating resolvers. > > I think if we want interoperability then we have to standardize anything > anybody is doing. > > If ietf documents client-subnet then it should be an FYI. That's hardly a > death sentence... Look what happened with SRV. > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my > brevity._______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
