On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > No, I fully disagree with this. Port 53 TCP has a much better chance at > working these days than a random other newly assigned port.
Not true. Port 53 is far more molested than "random": INBOUND firewall rules prevent you from running new services without firewall rule modifications, but outbound blocking is far less common. (Our test port for this is TCP 1947 with Netalyzr). -- Nicholas Weaver it is a tale, told by an idiot, nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu full of sound and fury, 510-666-2903 .signifying nothing PGP: http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/data/nweaver_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
