On 4/7/14, 9:40 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > This charter seems to fly in the fase of the traditional IETF charter > style, wherein a WG was deemed to have a set end point.
that's not entirely uncommon in ops charters. for better or worse operations (of dns, ipv6, multicast, global routing etc) doesn't just end when a working group as cleared it current milestones.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop