On 3/19/14, 12:42 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Hello > > This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time > mangement. After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to > the DNSOP charter: > > --- > > 5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol, > initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act > as clearinghouse or providing advice to ADs and other WGs on EDNS0 > options, new RRTYPEs, record synthesis, or other mechanics of extending > DNS to support other applications.
I fell like this is intended to allow work on issues related to the root/tld registration but without being explicit. I'm a little on the fence with respect to how explicit we want to but I think we should actually call it out. > 6. Publish documents which address DNS-related issues, by identifying > and documenting the problem space around the issue. The group will then > discuss these issues and decide if which group should address the > solution space. > > ------ > > We welcome your feedback either on the items, the wording, or anything > you wish to comment on. > > thanks > > tim >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
