Good news to me especially the point 6, for we are now considering some DNS-related issues. I would support this. Guangqing Deng CNNIC From: Tim WicinskiDate: 2014-03-20 03:42To: dnsopCC: joel jaeggliSubject: [DNSOP] Changes to Charter Hello This is a conversation I've scheduled a few times and I did poor time mangement. After some discussion we're proposing adding two items to the DNSOP charter: --- 5. Address possible minor changes or extensions to the DNS Protocol, initially with a focus on the operational impacts of these changes. Act as clearinghouse or providing advice to ADs and other WGs on EDNS0 options, new RRTYPEs, record synthesis, or other mechanics of extending DNS to support other applications. 6. Publish documents which address DNS-related issues, by identifying and documenting the problem space around the issue. The group will then discuss these issues and decide if which group should address the solution space. ------ We welcome your feedback either on the items, the wording, or anything you wish to comment on. thanks tim _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
