On 2014-03-09 10:19, Patrik Wallstrom wrote: > But the fact is that EPP is several magnitudes better harmonized > between TLDs compared to that registrars are offering their > customers. There is no way around that today, and the registrars have > no incentive at all to improve the situation. For all the registrars > to offer the same API to their customers would really remove the > lock-in effect that the proprietary interfaces that they have today.
The same lock-in as registries use already today with registrars. My point is that there is absolutely no difference between how registries lock in registrars (and because of that the registrants) and how the registrars lock in customers. Harmonizing the interface to registrars is _extremely_hard_ given how different the epp implementation is for the registries. The registrars that "lock in" (using your terminology) the registrants do that mainly because they support a specific flavor of registries, and have designed their API for those registries. If other registries where to be supported, the API would be different. > So how could we change this? I don’t see this happening from a > standard organization at all. So yes - registrars is really a big > reason for incompatibility. Registries could easily bypass the > current rrr model by exposing API:s directly to registrants, but it > wouldn’t be very popular with the registrars… In no particular order: 1. By having people stop claiming epp is one protocol and blaming the registrars being the problem. Pointing fingers does not help, because as in this thread, energy has to be spent on explaining the differences in epp between TLDs. 2. By having registries agreeing on whether DS or DNSKEY is the data they want, or by accepting both. 3. By having the IETF effort of to start with cataloging the epp extensions used by registries, and secondly working hard to try to harmonize the extensions. 4. By having the registrars that have an API harmonize their efforts just like registries harmonize theirs. Also: note that registries do sent the wholesale price for the domain registration, and the price on the market today for domain names is set by the ones that cross subsidize domain name costs with income from other services. Because of that there is a price squeeze which in some markets turn into negative revenue for registrars that sell domain names. Registries that now and then dump the wholesale prices does not make the situation better, as the end users start to believe the price is very low. Registrars complain on this behavior by registries, but the registries continue to do price dumping -- i.e. continue the price squeeze. Given this pricing structure, and that registries do change their implementations far too often, where do you think registrars do spend the money they have? They MUST support what the changes the registries do, they do not HAVE TO implement a common API. So, the registries MUST be the ones that start. Although there are many registrars that will follow. Including Frobbit that I am technical lead at. Now as I wrote above, IETF have started some very good work on epp extensions but I am amazed how many registries refuse to participate, complain, and fight against it. As long as they do, why should registrars be nice(r)? The market is broken, and as I said, I think we in IETF (when I was Area Director btw) where too nice when the whole epp work took place. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
