On 2014-03-08 09:00, Mark Andrews wrote: > They have failed to invent / document a common standard way for > machine updates to work. They could have quite easily got together > anytime in the last decade and done a standardised update protocol. > > But they haven't.
As long as the registries have _NOT_ unified their extensions of whatever fluffy things they want, so that I as a registrar _really_ can use the same EPP implementation to more than one (backend) registry, then registrars have to spend energy and real $$ to implement those incompatibilities. And do not have so much interest at all to do more than many an API that is specific for them that faces the registrant. We have been through this hundreds of times before and I think the blaming _registrars_ as the ones that have an incompatible portion of the system must stop. Now. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
