On Feb 17, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > Given your second paragraph, why create a new WG which will be an attractive > nuisance? Andrew's proposal of letting WGs that want the innovations seems > less likely to rekindle the dysfunction.
Then you're just moving the dysfunction to the IETF mailing list, as we've seen in the recent past. I'm not convinced that that's a win. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
