On Feb 17, 2014, at 1:15 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > Given experiences, I have to wonder if the whole idea of a long-term working > group just leads to dysfunction -- perhaps the IETF version of an echo > chamber (or perhaps even inbreeding). Perhaps a better approach would be to > use something like DNSOP which has an operations bent is use to see if there > are ideas/interest in particular topics that can drive the creation of > working groups that focus on the specific DNS-related issues?
Yup. However, creating working groups is a pretty heavyweight process—I think that's what motivates the long-term model for protocols where frequent extensions are likely. Possibly rotating working group chairs more frequently would work in such cases. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
