On 12/3/13, 9:08 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:00:30AM -0500, > Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote > a message of 20 lines which said: > >> Saying that using a non-IN class is a non-starter seems about as >> silly > > There have been an ITU project to use classes (UN instead of IN?) to > have different namespaces, probably to have the new spaces managed by > the ITU. The project was named Net4d (Web site seems down now). > > AFAIK, the project did not even attempt to actually test (at least in > in the lab) that it was feasible to use other classes. Knowing what > we know about the ossification of the Internet and the DNS, there are > very good reasons to be pessimistic.
using a new class for a greenfield seems somewhat different then expecting it to work across the population of internet resolvers that are already deployed. > If we want actual testing of the ability to run non-IN classes, I > accept donations in bitcoins to do so in my lab :-) But, anyway, you > have very little chance of convincing any developer to spend time in > this direction, which is clearly dead. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
