Dear colleagues, On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:49:54AM -0800, Dan York wrote: > I don't see why we can't adopt the CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC drafts as working > group documents and continue to move them along - we've had significant > discussion on these over the past several meetings and also on the lists:
There is, of course, no reason why people can't just work on these documents without any magic bits about WG adoption. Indeed, if recent history is any guide, it might be that getting adopted by DNSOP is a good way to ensure a document never actually emerges from being a draft. It seems to me that this list is reasonably chartered to address this issue. If the chairs disagree, there is another list still around that can also be used. In any case, what's more important is that the work gets done, and not that we manipulate all the process levers in the IETF machinery. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
