fair enough. Thanks for the clarification. - Joe On Oct 12, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 12/10/12 16:20, Joseph Gersch wrote: >> We had posted an updated draft on the reverse-DNS naming >> convention for CIDR address blocks and asked to discuss this at the >> Atlanta meeting. Did you miss this request? - Joe Gersch > > Yes we saw it. > > The principal place for discussion is the mailing list, and ideally > the WG meeting should be reserved for topics that have previously been > discussed on the list but would benefit from a face to face > discussion. Admittedly we don't always adhere to that principle, but > it does guide our decision. > > The decision whether or not to have a meeting is always finely > balanced. We have to book a slot quite far in advance of the IETF, > which we always do. But before the publication of the final IETF > agenda, we have to make a judgement as to whether we have the suitable > topics for a meeting or whether suitable topics are likely to arise > between then and the date of the meeting. What we don't want is to > either cancel the meeting once announced in the final agenda, or to > have a ridiculously short meeting because of lack of material. > > In this case, we looked at what had been discussed since the last > meeting and the feedback we got from the working group in response to > our request for topics, and decided that we didn't have enough > suitable material to justify a meeting this time. > > Stephen Joseph Gersch Chief Operating Officer Secure64 Software Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
