On Apr 16, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote: > On 4/15/12 10:42 AM, "Joe Abley" <joe.ab...@icann.org> wrote: > >> Patrik, >> >> Nobody is talking about creating NTAs. NTAs already exist. The question >> for this group is whether or not they are worth standardising. >> >> Joe > > Quite true, Joe! We'll keep using NTAs as needed. But I've had enough > people ask me to document what it was we were doing and why, and other > ISPs ask about it that I figured an informational document certainly > couldn't hurt. >
As one of the folk who asked -- thank you. I think that this is a useful document and is *really* needed to help with DNSSEC deployment, and fully support it's publication (especially if it comes with examples!)… The IETF publishing an RFC on this doesn't mean that folk will be forced to use it (and not publishing it doesn't mean that folk won't) -- if this were not true, we would have universal adoption of BCP 38, everyone would be running v6 and all packets involved in SPAM / DoS would have the Evil bit set… W > Jason > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
