On Thursday, October 27, 2011 10:06:25 Havard Eidnes wrote: > I wonder if I could please have someone say whether they agree > with me on this one: > ... > My claim is that it is a "Registry Error" for the operator of the > registry for the 'z' domain to permit this to happen, as it > violates the basic idea of what a "delegation" means. > ...
i'm +1 with this interpretation. not just because implementations do not all do the same thing in the presence of this data pattern, but because in recent decades we've adopted a "mount point semantics" view of dns delegations. this should be written down somewhere, because the rfc 1034 rules about "scan down the tree looking for a delegation" logic does not mesh well with the "closest enclosure" logic that most implementations actually follow. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
