Leo Liu(bing) wrote:

Not homework, but contribution to the 6renum WG : )
DDNS is an important topic in renumbering.

A problem is that IPv6 is unimportant mostly because of lack of
proper multihoming support which could have limited routing table
growth, which was why renumbering was necessary. But, it's too
late.

Ted Lemon wrote:

> Okay, this helps me to see where you were coming from with
> your other point about garbage in, garbage out.

In short, the garbage is SLAAC, which is not even stateless.

> The case where you'd want to use DHCP is the case where
> non-server hosts are being renumbered.

Automatic renumbering is most useful for site-wide renumbering
with provider changes.

Of course, the most difficult part is renumbering of glue,
which is solvable but ignored in this thread.

                                                Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to