Hi, Måns Thanks for the info, that's quite helpful. So can we assume that Windows-based DNS systems have been widely deployed rfc3007?
B.R. Bing > -----Original Message----- > From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > M?ns Nilsson > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 2:33 PM > To: Leo Liu(bing) > Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; re...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Dynamic DNS Update Deployment?? > > Subject: [DNSOP] Dynamic DNS Update Deployment?? Date: Mon, Aug 15, > 2011 at 01:32:48AM +0000 Quoting Leo Liu(bing) (leo.liub...@huawei.com): > > Hi, all > > > > We used to have a brief discussion about dynamic DNS update in in IPv6 > renum mail list(re...@ietf.org<mailto:re...@ietf.org>), and it was > considered as a mechanism to improve renumbering automation greatly. > > As we discussed, although RFC3007(Secure DNS Dynamic Update) is > reportedly widely implemented, widely available, and widely interoperable > today but not widely deployed. > > So I'm here to ask you DNS pro how about the rfc3007 and rfc2136(Dynamic > Updates in DNS) deployment state in real networks? Do you think they are > worth to be deployed in the name of improving renumbering? > > Since every Windows admin / consultant I've spoken to lately insists that > Windows DNSes with AD integration be used for anything related to name > resolution, and cites dynamic updates as a reason for this, there is some > anecdotal evidence that suggests the usage and importance of dynamic > updates. Also, one must assume some deployment. > > -- > Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina > MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 > I just heard the SEVENTIES were over!! And I was just getting in touch with > my LEISURE SUIT!! _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
