-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19-04-11 12:18, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > Hi Antoin, > > Would it be resolved if we use the following text? > s/appears/may appear/ > > ...; it is not listed in the NS RRSet, although its name may appear > in the SOA RRs MNAME field.
I think the definition of a hidden master is that it is not reachable from the public Internet, and therefor it's hostname does not need to resolve on the public Internet. The SOA RRs MNAME field was defined before hidden masters were used, so I don't know if a hostname in the MNAME field should resolve and be reachable. If it is, then it's no longer a hidden master, but just a public master that is not in the NS set. I think the best way forward for now is to say "it is not listed in the NS RRSet" and not mention anything about the MNAME field. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Utrechtseweg 310, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 F: +31 26 3525505 M: +31 6 23368970 mailto:antoin.verschu...@sidn.nl xmpp:ant...@jabber.sidn.nl http://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNrWoPAAoJEDqHrM883AgnyrAIAMeCRff1Q4tdhMpTGWUFkNoA XpD+BhyrXhRRqGDSatOQ1wnDiIvFn/pOqAgIq1rg/uxmb2PSvSl32FGJuMt3ug66 nTj84ivAYEQ8IJdwwdOQwDdzR/uz17yo91S0VMSbllkU6qCP7FwgVHRfr75iiNfv g6dEsze5S1hmkiRt5BR0Q0BnncsIo4I5aAzHHNscVC7pWt3Er9hmMR+hHsFat1lA aZ9REGsUJItiR6u1La36jVZmtKL/UONTKrAqFQo/xNKuLu+Y1EWD8VN4x3+vAhGi 8Xah/CulothdZg3NehbfR2x2kdhAGSgFmwW9JvjuGc7gbnIxXp430xpo6Qef6nA= =TfWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
