yeah, i saw marc's comment too.
in the ecology of tasted domains who's seo value is tending towards
the do-not-renew cost point, there exists a reservoir of "aged" domains.
ergo, any scheme to use domain age to differentiate domains acquired
for spam, maleware, ... purposes, if effective, will result in the use
of marginal seo assets as spam, maleware, ... assets, limiting the
utility of an age-aware spam, maleware, ... mitigation scheme.
a closer correlation to seo assets is the registrar and name server
association, and where slower-than-real-time and cached responses are
of use, the automated detection of type of value capture at the
resolved resource, e.g., ppc.
there are other reasons for attempting, as policy, of avoiding
delivering to the end user a resolution that has some property known
in advance.
-e
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
