On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, David Conrad wrote:
Again, I am not objecting to people using DLV. I think it is ucky, but that's just me. What I am objecting to is the suggestion made here that _before a TLD that has submitted its keys to the ITAR rolls its keys, it must notify the (potentially multiple?) folks who run a DLV registry, of which the TLD may have no knowledge, who have harvested ITAR data and wait_. That's just crazy talk.
A TLD should do due diligence. I mean, its their core business. Its the ONLY thing they should do right. Make sure theit zone file works. Even when this issue was found, they could have easilly added their old key to the zone to ensure DLV would work until it got updated. Arguing there might be 15 unknown DLV's is kind of beside the point. Reality is, there is only on DLV they need to worry about. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
