No that is because of microsoft's new security fixes. But since there is no
time-stamping process used to insure the integrity of the IETF's posting it
seems that you folks dont want anyone who is constrained by the IETF's MUST
DISCLOSE PATENT CONTROLS to do that.
If you did then you would already know that this patent controls the use of
a network-location as a crypto element of entitlement or authentication.
Todd Glassey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Wouters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "TS Glassey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <dnsop@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-dickinson-dnsop-nameserver-control-00
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, TS Glassey wrote:
Be advised that the IETF process REQUIRES ME TO NOTICE THE IETF EACH TIME
SOMETHING IS PUBLISHED WHICH INFRINGES ON THE PATENT, per the direct
words of
Is that why you are writing emails a month into the future?
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1749 - Release Date: 10/27/2008
7:57 AM
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
